In what ways does Shakespeare make the Banqueting scene dramatic? Essay

Through the romp of the play Macbeth, Shakespe ar clearly wishes to examine the supernatural elements to expound guilt and consciousness ca employ by witchcraft and demonology. Thus, in examining these elements, Shakespeares dramatises Macbeths sociological affect on Dun finish to convey the importance of pansyship and the consequences of particular choices.Firstly, Macbeths ideas of sightly pansy after receiving the prophecies from the witches had perform very salutary. Thus, His excitement prompted him to find out more than from the witches tell me more he asks them. Macbeth believed the knowledge given by them to be true. This curiosity suggests wherefore he was so determined to give mien king. My thought, whose murder is yet but fantastical Macbeth thought, the only way to capture king was to belt down Duncan.Furthermore, the king was Gods representative on earth and was chosen by god hence, to pull down the king would upset the natural order. Macbeth did not dest iny to kill Duncan, but he wanted to fulfil his ambition of becoming king, therefore, the only way to do this was by putting to death Duncan. Although, the prophecies were given both to Macbeth and Banquo, Banquo did not believe the witches What Can the Devil speak true? However, Macbeth hero-worshiped that the prophecy concerning Banquo would come true. Hence, this is why Macbeth arranged the cleanup position of Banquo.Furthermore, the scene before the Banqueting scene shows Banquo organism killed. This is followed by Macbeths happiness at being king. As a result, this would be prominent for a modern audience, as Macbeth who arranged the killing appeared to start no conscience. Therefore, to show the scene of Banquos murder followed by Macbeths happiness would be dramatic for a modern audience.This is because this would firstly, portray an evil port of Macbeth, and secondly, would convey how Macbeth is gentle hearted. The fact, that Macbeth was affected by the witches propheci es and reacted quickly to the situation in terms of how his thoughts rapidly changed for the bad, determines how easily he can be influenced. Therefore, this is what led him to be responsible for murder plans as well as murders taking place such as Duncan and Banquos death, and Fleances and Macduffs family death plan.Moreover, at the seed of the banquet, Macbeth appears to be confident in the way he speaks, You know your own degrees addressing his guests to sit down according to rank. At the moment, he is enjoying his position as king his confidence in his speech suggests this. He knows Banquo will be killed and does not want Banquo viable, because of the prophecies. Tis better thee without, than he within. If Banquo was hot, Macbeth feared that Banquo could have had a chance to become king. For Macbeth knows Banquos death will make him secure as king. This hope kept Macbeth occupied up until the murderer entered the room.Sequentially, when Banquos murderer enters, Macbeth gets excited getting prepared to find out the good news of Banquos death. However, when Macbeth says Theres blood upon thy face this suggests, this whole time Macbeth showed he was confident done his speech to his guests what is really going through his mind is kept hidden. In fact, Macbeth was panicking all this time something could happen. Theres blood upon thy face, indicates Macbeths fear as King and insecure feelings.The blood could symbolise a deep fear, pain and anger Macbeth is experiencing. Shakespeares use of dramatic irony is very hard-hitting here, as he is trying to create sympathy for Macbeth and tries to put across a message. As we learn that Macbeths does not have a strong character, we find out he is easily led into things. His weak character guides him to mischief. Macbeth did not want to kill these people however, his ambition to become king had grown. To kill those who were king, or who were to become king was the only solution. It seems he loses control, leading h imself from one evil to another, and thus, he is lost in his own thoughts. He feels regretful, but cannot mental block himself from evil, as it has just become a habit. Although, Macbeth committed few murders under his crown, he regretted and felt remorseful for his actions leading to murder, this is what makes him an interesting character.Once Macbeth finds out Banquo is killed, he becomes excited yet hes good that did the like for Fleance, wanting to know that Fleance is also killed. If Fleance was still alive then he would have a chance to become king. The prophecy concerning Banquo mentioned that Banquo will be lesser than Macbeth, and greater Banquo will not become king, but his son can become king. This suggests that Macbeth would become king. Not so happy, yet much happier Banquo will not be alive, but his son will live and will have chance to become king. As for Macbeth he will become king but will be not be the rightful and happy king. When Macbeth finds out Fleance is sti ll alive he has a fit.The drama of the fit has been emphasised to convey a message. Macbeth thought if both the Father and son were killed he would have else been unblemished. If both son and father were killed Macbeth would have been Whole as a marble, founded as a rock, as broad and general as the casing circulate. The use of similes helps to convey a better catch of Macbeths anxieties, helping the audience understand how Macbeth would have been free and powerful as king. Now that Fleance is alive Macbeth feels cabind, cribbd, confind the use of assonance is again emphasised to convey Macbeths fears, his doubts and insecure feelings as king. Macbeth wants Fleance killed Get thee gone tomorrow as he fears if Fleance is still alive, then he will have chance to become king.In addition, Macbeth goes back to join his quests and mentions that Banquo is not present at the banquet. Then, he goes onto expressing how he feels that Banquo is not present, Who I may rather challenge for unk indness. No one at the banquet knows Macbeth is responsible for Banquos death therefore, Macbeth takes advantage of this and blames Banquo for not being there, though, Macbeth is blameworthy. Although, Macbeth does this, inside he feels guilty for what he has done his guilt is hidden from his guests.The dramatic irony is used, to explain Macbeths guilt. Macbeth cannot join his guests at the delay, because the tables full at this moment Macbeth can see a figure sitting at his place. No one at the Banquet can see this figure accept for Macbeth. The dramatic irony is used here, to express how Macbeth was not the rightful king and instead Banquo was supposed to be king. Macbeth becomes fearful and apprehensive you canst not say, I did it. Here Macbeth sees Banquos ghost, he feels really regretful for killing Banquo and feels frustrated. This frustration almost leads him to mentioning his guilt for killing Banquo.However, Lady Macbeth realises her husbands short coming, and makes up a quick lie, to stop her husband for spitting out his guilt You shall offend him, and extend his passion. Lady Macbeth tells the guest to clutch seat, if not they the guest will prolong his suffering and emotion.Furthermore, Lady Macbeth thinks her husband has put himself at shame, thinking this fear is from killing Duncan. This is the very painting of your fear the use of metaphor makes it more dramatic, expressing how Macbeth has a sense of fear on his face. That fact, that no one knew Banquo appeared as ghost, makes things even more dramatic.As for a modern audience, they would understand how Macbeth feels regretful for killing Banquo. You look but on a stool Lady Macbeth thinks her husband is crazy, thinking why does he feel regretful for killing Duncan. To a modern and Jacobean audience this would indicate that Macbeth was not the rightful king. She does not know that Macbeth was responsible for Banquos death. As Macbeth looks at the stool, Lady Macbeth does not know why Macbet h is looking at it. The fact, that Banquo comes back as ghost, is an unnatural event. After killing Duncan, Macbeth first and foremost, disorders the natural order, and this is why he sees illusions such as the dagger, Banquo as a ghost.In addition, after Macbeths wife tries to calm him, Macbeth feels normal again and mentions something virtually Banquo Would he were here says to his guests. Macbeth sees Banquo as ghost again and goes crazy. His attitude changes to become angry due to seeing Banquo. When Banquo appears this time, Macbeth expresses his inward feelings, thus, expressing it strong.He expresses it quite strong because this is way he is feeling, distressed and pained. This feeling is so intense that Macbeth wants to quit his sight. The use of exclamation marks expresses his anger and fear. Macbeth compares his feeling to his wifes, expressing how his cheeks are blanchd with fear, after all that he has done. As Lady Macbeth does not know Macbeth was responsible for Banqu os death, he describes his wife cheeks as natural scarlet and his cheeks to be full of fear. This expresses how Macbeth feels remorseful for Killing Banquo.The Banquet ends with disorder. As the banquet ends with disorder Lady Macbeth takes control Stand not upon the order of your going. At the beginning of the scene, the guests were required to sit down according to rank, now they are told to leave not according to rank, but all at once. The drama is used to explain, how Macbeth did something which was against the rule of god and how he upset the natural order. This scene is emphasised to convey the message. The disorder of the banquet is used to express how Macbeths actions are leading him and Scotland towards disaster. To a modern audience this performance would have been expressed and portrayed well, and from it they would have understood the laws of the time.The performance of this scene would have been very evoke for a Jacobean audience typically because it included themes r elated to witchcraft, demonology and the divine right of King which were based on the beliefs of the 17th century. The audience sitting to crack the performance would have been familiar and may have even believed in witchcraft. From this performance they would have realised the importance of kingship, and understand the consequences which would have led to killing a king. Moreover, to understand belief in witches was wrong, as this would have brought intimately harm.On the other hand, to a modern audience this play would have brought more or less realisation. As witchcraft is not widely believed today, this would make the audience come to understand why there is not much of it. Reasons such as war had led to discomfort, and sorrow around 17th century, hence, witchcraft was an alternative to happiness, and would have kept people occupied upon evil things. As the witches at the beginning of the play say fair is foul, and foul is fair good is bad, and bad is good. Lady Macbeths order of leaving to the men was portrayed well. Shakespeare tries to explain how women did not have the right to command men, thus, this further reinforces the idea of disorder.The drama of this play is very effective, and thus, the disorder of play greatly reinforces the meaning of the play. Through, the use of dramatic irony, this first and foremost, warns the audience of the consequences which one could face in regards to killing a king. The message which is conveyed is the importance of kingship. In addition, by the use of drama this clearly portrays how killing of king leads to the disorder of the natural order therefore, this is portrayed as a serious matter, thus, reinforcing the idea of how killing of king is very serious. Secondly, the disorder of play emphasises the excite about how witchcraft can be a dangerous path to follow. By viewing the unnatural events, such as Banquo coming back as ghost, this portrays clearly how following the paths of witches can result in disaster a nd pain in ones life.The two main aspects in this play are the killing of king and witchcraft. The importance of kingship is greatly emphasised, as it is of great importance to both modern people and Jacobeans. The fact, that Shakespeare does not bring Macbeth back to sense, means the killing of king is wrong. It is used to emphasise the great importance of the position of king. James the I would have approved of this.At the time of the Jacobeans, the king was gods representative on earth, to kill him would cause great disaster or disorder to the creation hence, the position of kingship would affect society at large. For a modern society the understanding of killing the President or King would be very wrong and brutal. Shakespeare, explains and rages out how civilised it leaders are, it is evident that both the Jacobeans and the modernised society hold in the importance of this, and I agree. Does anyone have the right to take the leaders position away? If he sets legislations to ke ep you under safety, then think about the great disaster that would be brought about if someone killed him